dallas attorney for drug trafficking defense

There are many kinds of drug charges that the government may bring in federal court. The most common charges are the distribution of a controlled substance and conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance.

People who are convicted often face harsh sentences in the range of 30 years to life. Unlike defendants facing charges in state court and sentences in state prison, people who are serving time in federal prison must serve 85 percent of their sentence.

If you’ve been charged with drug trafficking or another serious drug offense, you need an experienced Dallas federal criminal defense attorney who has successfully handled cases like yours before. At Broden & Mickelsen, LLP, our drug trafficking lawyers will immediately launch into a full investigation and develop a strategy for how to successfully defend your case.

We will fight tooth and nail for the best possible outcome. If a guilty plea is inevitable, our team will work diligently to secure a favorable plea bargain that does not call for a mandatory minimum sentence.

Contact Broden & Mickelsen, LLP for a free case review with a seasoned Dallas drug crime defense lawyer.

How Broden & Mickelsen, LLP Defends Clients Against Drug Trafficking Charges

When state or federal drug trafficking charges threaten your future, you need experienced attorneys who know how to defend you. Broden & Mickelsen, LLP brings more than 60 years of combined criminal defense experience and board-certified specialization in criminal law and criminal appellate law through the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.

Our firm represents clients in Texas state and federal courts, from investigation through trial, appeal, and post-conviction proceedings. When you hire us, our drug trafficking defense attorneys can do the following for you:

  • Explain the charges, court procedures, and your defense options
  • Investigate the allegations and examine the government’s evidence
  • Challenge unlawful searches, unreliable evidence, and procedural errors
  • File motions to exclude illegally obtained evidence
  • Pursue dismissal or negotiate a plea agreement when appropriate
  • Defend you at hearings, trial, and sentencing
  • Handle appeals and pursue post-conviction relief when necessary

Our work defending drug charges in Texas state and federal courts includes jury acquittals and overturned convictions, including the following*:

  • The government accused our client of distributing marijuana in Dallas, but Clint Broden uncovered evidence showing the client was elsewhere when the alleged activity occurred. The jury returned a NOT-GUILTY VERDICT.
  • A 68-year prison sentence followed a drug distribution conviction obtained while the client had different counsel. After taking over the appeal, Clint Broden demonstrated that the trial court gave the jury improper instructions. The Court of Appeals REVERSED THE CONVICTION.
  • Despite three previous federal drug convictions, another client was ACQUITTED AFTER A THREE-DAY JURY TRIAL. The client had faced 22 to 27 years in prison as a career criminal.

Here’s what one person had to say about how our law firm handled their legal matter:

“I can’t say enough good things about Mr. Clint Broden with Broden & Mickelsen, LLP. I hired him to help an inmate, and from the start he was straightforward, honest, and did exactly what he said he would do — and he did it quickly. That kind of follow-through is hard to find. The inmate was so grateful and impressed, and so was I. It was a pleasure to work with an attorney who didn’t just take a retainer and disappear; he kept his word and followed through on his commitment. Truly a great experience all the way around. Highly recommend Mr. Broden!”

Because each court system demands a different defense strategy, reach out to Broden & Mickelsen, LLP today so we may review your case specifics and provide the best options.

Our Dallas Drug Trafficking Lawyers Have Extensive Experience Handling Complex Drug Cases

dallas drug trafficking attorney

Our Dallas drug trafficking attorneys at Broden & Mickelsen, LLP have successfully represented numerous individuals at trial and through the sentencing process in federal drug trafficking cases. Some notable drug cases include:

  • A client with three prior federal drug convictions who was facing 22 to 27 years imprisonment for being a career criminal was found NOT GUILTY by a Midland jury of a new drug charge after a three-day trial.
  • A district judge in the Southern District of Florida, after the filing of a Hyde Amendment motion by Broden & Mickelsen, LLP found that the government’s prosecution of the defendant had been in bad faith and ordered the government to pay all attorney fees and costs incurred by the defendant. This is one of only a handful of Hyde Amendment motions that have ever been granted.
  • A client who was charged with distributing large amounts of marijuana was found NOT GUILTY by a jury in Dallas after our investigation proved that the client was not in Dallas during the times the government claimed he was distributing marijuana.
  • A United States district judge for the Southern District of Florida dismissed a federal drug case involving large amounts of cocaine on the second day of trial because of the government’s discovery violations. The client, who had previously been represented by 10 different lawyers, was released after spending over seven years in prison.

What Is Considered Drug Trafficking?

You may be charged with drug trafficking if you knowingly sell, manufacture, distribute, transport, or dispense a controlled substance. You may also face charges if you are found in possession of controlled substances with the intent to manufacture drugs, distribute drugs, or dispense them.

These cases can be extremely complex, with multiple defendants and a significant amount of discovery. After an arrest, you need to speak with a Dallas drug trafficking attorney as soon as possible to begin constructing a strong defense.

Understanding the Federal Drug Sentencing Guidelines in Dallas

The federal sentencing guidelines are primarily intended to reduce sentencing disparities in federal court. They are a complex system for evaluating the severity of a given crime through a point system. The more severe the crime, the more points, and the final “offense level” determination.

Once the offense level of a given crime is determined, a guideline sentencing range is derived by cross-referencing the offense level with the defendant’s criminal history category. The criminal history category is derived from an analysis of the defendant’s criminal convictions and sentences and how recent they are. Although a federal judge is not required to impose a sentence within the guideline sentencing range, they are required by law to calculate the guideline range and give “consideration” to them when imposing a sentence.

As a practical matter, the vast majority of federal judges impose sentences within the guideline range. If they elect to “depart” or “vary” from the guideline range, they do so by reducing or increasing the offense level or criminal history for some reason not taken into account in the initial offense level or criminal history determination.