DALLAS CRIMINAL LAWYERS.: FEDERAL, STATE & APPEALS - BRODEN & MICKELSEN LLP

Defending Different Types of Federal Conspiracy Charges

Defending Different Types of Federal Conspiracy Charges by Broden & Mickelsen

Defending Different Types of Federal Conspiracy Charges

Federal conspiracy charges are tough to defend. Learn about the charges and how to prepare the best defense.

Federal prosecutors are often faced with the challenge of presenting difficult cases. One of their favorite tools to help seal a win and maximize sentencing is by adding federal conspiracy charges to the mix.

Federal conspiracy is a broad term that’s used to describe many types of illegal conduct involving a conspiracy. With a federal conspiracy charge, the United States Attorney’s office can indict a larger group of people surrounding the crime.

Often, a federal conspiracy charge can significantly increase a fine or the length of sentencing upon conviction, or possibly both.

It’s important to understand the different types of federal conspiracy charges and how they can impact sentencing.

The Different Types of Federal Conspiracy Charges

Before outlining some of the different types of federal conspiracy charges, let’s first begin by detailing what constitutes a conspiracy under the laws of the United States.

The federal conspiracy statute, 18 U.S. Code § 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or defraud the United States, describes conspiracy as a criminal act, “If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.” ¹

There are a couple of important things to point out in this statute. The first is that one cannot act alone in a conspiracy, it must involve at least two or more people.

Secondly, there must also be an agreement between the parties involved to commit a federal crime, and at least one of the parties must make an overt act to further the conspiracy.

Furthermore, for a federal conspiracy charge to stand up in court, the agreement to conspire must be made between at least two people that are not federal agents, law enforcement officer or confidential informants.

Since it’s possible for two or more people to conspire to commit just about any federal crime, conspiracy charges can be added to a variety of cases. Conspiracy to commit drug trafficking, fraud and other white-collar crimes are the most common charges.

The statute outlines other charges that include:

  • Conspiracy to commit any offense against the United States or to defraud the United States
  • Conspiracy to commit fraud
  • Conspiracy to restrain trade
  • Conspiracy to violate RICO
  • Conspiracy to commit a federal health care offense
  • Conspiracy to deprive a person of their civil rights
  • Conspiracy to submit fraudulent claims to the United States
  • Conspiracy to violate the Controlled Substances Act as outlined in 21 U.S.C. § 841
  • Seditious conspiracy

Federal Conspiracy Sentencing Guidelines

The federal conspiracy sentencing guidelines help determine the minimum and maximum sentencing when a conspiracy charge is involved. Sentencing depends on the type and severity of the crime involved.

For example, Section 371 felony conspiracy convictions are punishable by not more than five years and a fine not to exceed $250,000, except for organizations for which the fine can be no more than $500,000. However, conspirators convicted of drug trafficking, racketeering, terrorism and many other white-collar crimes face the same sentencing as those who committed the underlying offense. ²

Conspiracy charges can also form the basis for a forfeiture order or restitution.

Fighting Federal Conspiracy Charges

In some cases, defense against a conspiracy charge can be a difficult task. While it’s the federal prosecutor’s responsibility to prove conspiracy, they do not need to provide any written proof of the conspiracy.

Often, defendants can be brought in on a conspiracy charge even if they didn’t commit the crime themselves, but in some way increased the ability for others to do so. The prosecutor can prove their case by presenting any evidence to prove that at least two people worked together in some way, or that the agreement was implicit.

The best defense for a federal conspiracy charge is to simply show that the defendant did not willingly or knowingly engage in the acts.

It’s also possible to base a defense on the withdrawal from the conspiracy. In this case, the defendant must show that they withdrew themselves from the conspiracy before the crime had taken place.

A withdrawal defense can be used if the defendant told other people in the conspiracy that they did not want to take part in the crime, or if they went to law enforcement to inform them of the conspiracy, or if they committed other acts that proved to be inconsistent with furthering the conspiracy as the plan was set forth among other members.

Depending on the case, there are several other possible defenses against federal conspiracy charges that a defendant can discuss in more detail with their attorney.

Federal Conspiracy Attorney in Dallas

Defendants facing federal conspiracy charges need the representation of an attorney with expertise in defending federal criminal cases. Without a federal conspiracy attorney in Dallas, defendants face serious consequences, including lengthy prison sentences.

Conspiracy charges are serious but often misunderstood. Knowledgeable legal representation can help defendants understand the severity of the crime they’re facing and work with them to prove their innocence.

Broden & Mickelsen

Dallas Federal Criminal Defense Lawyers

T:(214) 720-9552

https://www.brodenmickelsen.com/

 

Sources

  1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/371
  2. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41223.pdf

 

***ATTORNEY ADVERTISING***

Prior results cannot and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future case.

 

It's only fair to share...Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Pin on Pinterest
Pinterest
Print this page
Print